|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Table 1. Sampling depths in |
|
|
0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 |
6000 2000 600 200 |
2000 600 200 60 |
600 200 60 20 |
200 60 20 6 |
60 20 6 2 |
20 6 2 0.6 |
|
|
Nonhomogeneous samples are more
difficult to analyze
when the thermal diffusivity varies significantly with depth
and when the absorption coefficient is not small relative to
the thermal-wave decay coefficient. Variations in the thermal
diffusivity between thin layers of a material result in variations
in sampling depth within the sample and in thermal-wave reflection
effects9 at interfaces, both of which make
interpretation of results more complicated. Analyses based on
stronger absorption bands also can lead to ambiguities since
the sampling depth is now determined by the decay of both the
infrared beam and the thermal-waves within the sample. Furthermore,
when the sampling depth is reduced by increasing the modulation
frequency, reduction occurs in the saturation induced truncation
of strong bands. This phenomenon can be incorrectly interpreted
as an increase in species concentration near the surface. (See
Section V. D.). |
|
|
![]() |