|
|
|
|
The desired result with all FT-IR sampling techniques is to obtain
an absorbance spectrum of the sample as quickly and easily as possible.
In many cases, however, direct analysis of “as received” samples by
transmission or reflection methods is not practical because the sample either
transmits inadequate light to measure or it lacks suitable surface or particle
size conditions for reflectance spectroscopies.
In other cases, reflectance spectroscopies may not probe deeply enough
into the sample to yield the desired information.
Photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS)1-3 is unique as a
sampling technique, because it does not require that the sample be transmitting,
has low sensitivity to surface condition, and can probe over a range of
selectable sampling depths from several micrometers to more than 100
m
PAS signal generation is initiated when the FT-IR beam, which oscillates
in intensity, is absorbed by the sample resulting in the
absorption-induced
heating in the sample and oscillation of the sample temperature.
The temperature oscillations occurring in each light-absorbing layer
within the sample launch propagating temperature waves called thermal-waves,
which decay strongly as they propagate through the sample.
It is this thermal-wave decay process that defines the layer thickness,
or sampling depth, from which spectral information is obtained in an FT-IR PAS
analysis. The sampling depth can be
increased by decreasing, via FT-IR computer control, the IR beam modulation
frequency imposed by the interferometer. The
lower modulation frequency allows a longer time for thermal-waves to propagate
from deeper within the sample into the gas.
As the sampling depth increases, the saturation of strong bands in PAS
spectra increases just as it does in absorbance spectra measured by transmission
as sample thickness increases.
The discovery of the photoacoustic effect by Alexander Graham Bell in
1880 marked the beginning of the development of the technique as a useful
spectroscopic method.4 Development
was hampered, however, by the weak acoustic signals that must be measured due to
the very high thermal-wave reflection coefficient at the sample-to-gas
interface. A high fraction of the
thermal-wave amplitude is reflected back into the sample and is not detected,
leading to signal-to-noise problems. Signal saturation also was a problem in the
initial efforts to apply the technique in the ultraviolet and visible spectral
regions. Operation in the
near- and
mid-infrared spectral regions, made practical with the multiplexing capability
of FT-IR systems and the higher sensitivity of